Hello.
Cool.
So I was watching Martin
Shkreli's finance lectures and
he gave lectures
with a list of it's kind of financial
advice. And he starts out by saying, what is finance?
He breaks it down into, well, okay, if you want to get into it,
you have a choice. You can either invest your own money or other people's money.
Investing your own money probably only makes sense if you have a lot of it.
You need tools to.
There's no reason you should be investing your money if somebody else can invest it
better. Basically, good advice.
So I thought I'd do something similar for programming.
I was watching. I Googled how
to learn to program.
Let's do this. How to learn to program
also. Again, like, you guys think I'm on drugs constantly.
I'm really not. I smoke
weed occasionally, I drink occasionally.
I don't really do harder drugs than that.
I don't think I've taken Adderall or any other stimulants this year.
I don't know why you guys all think that maybe
there's something defective about my brain chemistry.
So I'm not going to teach you Vim if you think you
want to learn. Park type. Thank you for subscribing. And I'm hoping to get a
lot of subscribers to this stream because I'm going to try to educate
instead of just a lot of
times when I talk, I'm not trying
to be made
sense of. I'm not. I'm trying to.
I'm thinking out loud. And I'm not trying to explain
things such that an audience will understand.
So we could say, yeah, look, I can tell
you, here's Lifehacker.com, the best ways to teach yourself
to code. And really it comes down to just
doing it, like almost everything.
But I think a question a lot of people have is, what exactly do
I do? So let's
bring them up here and let's talk
about what a program is. Okay, so you have a
program. What's the definition of a program? Well,
you can think about it like this. A program takes in some input,
does some computation, and produces some output.
So there's an argument to be made that we should be teaching
kids how to program using functional languages, because functional
languages more closely match this paradigm.
But computers don't operate
like functions. Computers operate a lot more like Turing
machines, which we can get into too. So maybe on one side
of an extreme, we have like a high level
functional programming language like Haskell. And then let's not really
go lower than 6C and assembly are. C and
assembly are the same structurally. So you
can treat C and assembly like the same thing. C is kind of assembly with
a bit of syntactic sugar around it. There is nothing in
C that doesn't very clearly map to something in assembly.
Please subscribe. I hope you guys like this kind of content.
Okay, so let's say like languages span
the gamut from C over to Haskell,
right? Then you can take languages and languages
go in a few directions. You can think of this as like the
functional spectrum,
and then maybe there's C over to Python and this
is kind of the ease of use spectrum.
So in the 90s, it was believed that object oriented
programming was going to be this revolution in programming.
That's C going to C, right?
Basically. And you can take it even further. Microsoft created
these things called com objects, and everything was going to
be an object to pass around. Smalltalk has this kind of paradigm also.
But it turned out this didn't actually improve programmer productivity.
The thing that improved programmer productivity was garbage
collection. So when
you think of a computer, first, I mean, we kind of have to ask the
question, what is a computer?
So you
can think about it like you have a processor that runs a stream
of instructions and then you have ram.
Now you can break RAM into two things. There's two things stored in ram.
There's instructions and there's data.
So most computers really don't treat these things very differently.
When I make a program
like hello World and
I compile this, we can take a look
in this program.
And that's not even all of it.
Yeah, so we have a.
This section here, this is actually the ASCII for hello World.
So it's in the same memory space as
the instructions itself, which does the printing of hello World.
Here's the main function. This call to Dylad Stubbinder
is actually what calls the printf.
So yeah, what is a computer processor and ram?
Then you can break down your program.
So when you have a program, a program has text,
it's called text, which is the instructions.
A program has a stack, program has a heap,
and a program has bss. So BSS are things
like static data.
There's a stack and then there's a heap. Heaps you get to through Malloc.
Stacks you get to through anything like
this is a variable on the
stack.
Local vars also control flows on the stack.
If I have a main function and I call A, what this
does is pushes the return
location to the stack.
So, you know, when I call B down here,
this at the end here is returned by popping
off stack.
Okay, so this is a basic idea of what a computer
is. Now there's a whole nother direction you
can go with the idea of what is programming.
Right. There is a practical,
like, I want to get a job, right?
Programming for work.
Maybe we'll make a note too. We'll call it
programming for work. So what does this mean?
What does a software engineer do?
Well, they don't really write algorithms.
You will never in any job have to write a sort
algorithm, a binary search algorithm, anything like that.
So they don't write algorithms.
What else? Well, very few people actually
work on. There's some people who work on infrastructure,
but that's not a lot of people. Most software engineers are
basically translators and
they translate a language, maybe we'll call
the language business requirements into
code.
And there's a whole lot of frameworks which exist to
make writing things that meet business
requirements easier. If you think of a business requirement
like, you know, we need a web page that's going to
allow users to say, leave a phone number where we
can call them back. Right. There's a lot of frameworks that are designed to
do things like that. If you wanted to write something on that, you could
use something like Ruby on Rails. Right.
And that's why I hate when Vim does
that. I don't actually know for
like, you know, know, web apps.
There's also this paradigm of CRUD apps. Let me get
what CRUD stands for.
The four basic types of SQL, command, Create, read,
update, delete.
So let's say we want to build Ruby
on Rails or similar for
web apps, and you're basically creating an app that looks like
Create, read, update, delete. There's some
front end, the view,
there's some database which is the model, and then there's
the business logic,
which is a controller.
So let's say the front end is. Let's go back to that.
I want to build a portal where my
customers can add
their phone number such that we'll be able to call them. They have
to be able to update their phone number due to gdpr. They have to be
able to delete their profile. You can see how it translates to this,
right? So this isn't. This is
terrible. You're not just the same
way. The word doctor means so many things. A doctor is someone who diagnoses
a doctor. Someone who prescribes. A doctor is someone who has bedside
manner. A software
engineer, like, it's kind of misleading and it's
almost nothing like what you do in school,
if you're in school and you're learning how
to write binary search algorithms, it's nothing like what you
do in practice. What you do in practice is really, you're translating from
a really shitty language into
these things that are like code. And I meet these people and
this is what you're going to learn, what you will learn
in boot camps, right?
So for example, no one who's ever gone to a boot camp would ever
get a job at comma, AI. Because at comma you don't do this.
Nothing at comma looks like this, this stupid
paradigm. And this is the thing that's going to be replaced
pretty soon by, by AIs. I think
about writing this like if you want
to write the low brow version of backspace,
backspace is basically
this. I mean, so here, step one, build a
CRUD app contracting firm.
Step two,
record all the
inputs of my contract developers.
Say contract developers and make fun of this one full time developers
train AI model to translate
business logic into code translators.
So yeah, if you guys are thinking about
a job like this, you know, it's, it's, it's truly,
it's really trash work. You can
get paid some amount of money doing it.
But your, your monks
used to do this. Monks used to like spend time copying. They'd have to.
Before there were printing presses. They'd have to. Well, someone's got to copy the
Bible. So that's practically what you're doing. It's not very,
you know, it's kind of trash, right?
So notice how none of this go
back to this guy here. None of this has
anything to do with this. They're completely separate things.
A software engineer, a lot of these people who I meet who are software
engineers know basically nothing about computers.
What they know about is how to translate
this shitty language into code is
almost giving it too much credit.
And then here, so let's think of like, like Ruby react,
right? Think of all the very heavy frameworks.
It almost has nothing to do with programming and it's like you're memorizing weird syntax,
something stupid.
So let's talk about things that are
more interesting. So I
come from, I learned this stuff from my kind of hacking background.
What is hacking? Well, so again,
programs have input,
computation output.
So if you want to attack the system, we'll call this a system, right?
If you want to say get like a, you want to get like remote code
execution on the system, right? The question you ask
is what input to
the system achieves my
desired outcome.
So again, a lot of hacking is because,
like the, the, the system didn't
think to check for what it is I'm sending it. And you can get the
system to behave in ways that aren't within
the normal bounds of output. So if you think this is actually a function,
right? What are the words in function? You have a domain, there's the input
to a function, function,
range, or like, you know, Y equals F of X,
right? So this
is a, this is a pure model.
But most computation is impure. When it's impure,
the function doesn't necessarily have to output something in the range. It can
do something entirely different.
So yeah, I mean, what is, what is hacking? It's figuring out
how the
function,
you know, figuring out how to make
the function behave how you want.
Now you can use the same paradigm
to analyze almost anything,
right? Input, system output.
Say you want to change your flight on United and you don't want to pay
change fees. Well, you can think of. The input is, what can I
do? Well, I have a. I can call, I can call
the United customer support line. The system is the
customer support agent, and the output is them
clicking a button on their computer that says wave change fees. Probably written
in some CRUD app, right? So if you think about
it like that, you think, okay, how do I get the system?
What inputs? Well, what do I have control over? I can
make multiple calls. I can change the words that I
say on each call. You can do things that are
completely out of bounds of the system entirely. You can, you know, get the
person's real name. You can dox them, you can threaten them. You might go to
jail for these things. I'm not advising you do it. But it's all within this
paradigm of input, system output. And that's what,
what is programming? Input, computation, output.
Thank you for subscribing. No, no,
there is. It's starting to get big. Are we getting people watching
this stream? Oh, yeah. Okay, now we. Let's get viewers.
Let's get viewers. So when you
ask the question, what is programming?
How do I get good at programming? I don't understand
what it is that you want.
Any, any website, any boot camp will
teach you functioning CRUD app programming.
When it comes down to hacking, every system is different. If you want to
get good at hacking, you just need to practice this basic idea.
Remember that one of the reasons I don't play CTFS anymore is because it
became too boxed.
I feel similarly about competition programming. Competition programming
is not about who can cleverly come up with New algorithms. It's just
about, you know, pattern recognition. Okay. Recognize that this
is actually a graph isomorphism problem.
I can do graph isomorphism,
that's np, but, oh, this is actually a binary
search over this and I can sort the list in N log
n instead of N squared. And I can solve it in time, right?
Yeah. So CTFs are still fun and CTF still
like. I think there's some that kind of probably break the paradigm. But a lot
of it became the same tricks over and over again. And you just drilled
once you can drill. It's no longer a test of intelligence.
It's a test of like, you know, are you willing to practice? Are you willing
to put 40 hours into a week into learning some relatively
useful skills? I shouldn't
hate on CTFs, and they're a great way to get into this stuff. It's just
a thing like back
in the day, CTFS didn't feel as much like this, but competition programming already did.
And I have nothing but praise for the time that I spent doing competition programming
and learning what there is to learn and then realizing once you're
just going to be grinding, it's time to stop.
Yeah. Hacking and coding is all about learning and applying new skills.
So repetition runs counter to what it's all about. Okay,
so if you watch my stream two days ago where I did
the adding the for loops to clang,
that's another. You can get paid a lot of money if you can do this.
Right. This is kind of what my Ethereum contract was,
understand. So maybe there's a like
high browse software engineering.
Understand a complex system,
modify the system to say,
add a feature,
ship to new system,
meaning like test well and stuff.
So there's a whole lot of software engineering kind of contracts
or jobs that look like this. Understand a complex system,
modify the system to add a feature, ship the new system.
If you make yourself challenges like that Clang for loop challenge
that I showed you, you'll get good at at this.
You want to be a ML engineer?
Well, here's the steps to get good at that.
Download paper,
Implement it,
implement it.
Keep doing this until
you have skills.
No test today. Slack mage. Thank you for subscribing.
When you guys say, I saw a comment on one of the,
on one of the recent YouTube videos where you say, oh, if only George would
do would do lessons. What is it you want to learn?
What is it that, that you want to.
You want me to do? What is it
that you think you can't do?
You want how to get A girlfriend, right?
And again, let's use the same, let's use the same, the same,
the same paradigm, right? Input,
system, output, right?
So, well, what are you going to need as an input to the system?
I mean, you want a girlfriend, you want women.
A system, like,
I don't know what you mean. First, can you come up with a definition?
You know, let's come up with an exact definition of get a
girlfriend, right? Oh, not Martin Scarlet's YouTube finance
lessons,
right? So first, define get a girlfriend.
Now the system is, you know,
the female mind. And let's say the output
is a. Let's say, let's just say it's an imessage
saying. So we are official
now, right?
So I mean, you can think about this, right? So, so I mean, we can
use the same sort of tricks we used on the United flight
attendant trying to get the change fees, right? Like,
okay, one thing I've learned
studying pickup is you don't get
better at seducing women. You just get better at
screening women. It's not about convincing women
to sleep with you or date you. It's about finding the women who are already
interested in sleeping, sleeping with you or dating you.
So, right, same sort of approach.
And you can treat this like a funnel, right? So let's talk about funnels.
So this is a classic sales
kind of thing. Let's say you want to sell cars,
right? Same approach. Same approach.
One, you have the top of the funnel,
which is like getting the word out, right? You can do this with like advertising.
Too many, you get some people who visit the
dealership, right? And this is a funnel.
Let's say 1,000 people see your ad. Let's say 10,000 people see your
ad. 100 people visit
the dealership. And let's say,
you know, five by cars,
right? So what's your ratio
here? You have 1% here, and you have a 5% conversion ratio here,
and you're falling off your funnel. So, you know, we can do the exact same
thing here. One 100 message.
This is sent to women.
We can say maybe 20 replies.
Let's, let's, let's let's say 30 replies of
every one of those. We'll say we have five dates,
two lays, one girlfriend,
right?
Same idea, right? It's just funnels. So this here
is 30%
ratio. This is a 1,
6, whatever that is in percent, like 18%.
This is 40%. And this is 50%, right?
Funnels,
1.2 K viewers. Let's go.
No, you don't want a vim Lesson, right? That's like,
oh, how do I make a product that make me a millionaire?
Okay, all right, I'm getting money.
Well, so the thing about getting money is
there's only one way to get money. This is capitalism.
Capitalism is based around consent.
And this is kind of the beauty of capitalism. In capitalism, you have a
buyer and you have a seller, and both
parties must consent
to the transaction.
So if you want
to make a million dollars, the only way to get money.
Getting money in a
capitalist system.
System is one way to do it, and it's convinced
others to give it to you.
Right? You can't make money. You can't produce your own
money. There is one way to get money, and that's to convince
other people to give it to you. Yeah, welcome to
NBA bullshit, right? So if you have
two people and one guy's selling an apple, and it's $10, and the other guy's
like, I'll give you $5 for the apple. The seller can now say, okay,
I consent to your $5, but I don't consent. And there's no transfer transaction.
Beauty. Beautiful, right? Getting money
in a capital system. Convince others to give it to you. So to answer your
question, how do you get make
$1 million from
product? Well, so you can kind of.
All right, ready for some MBA bullshit? I'll give you some real NBA bullshit so
you can think about who you want to target your product to. You can either
make $1 from 1 million people,
you can get $1 million from
one person, and then there's a whole spectrum in the middle. Let's say $1,000 from
1,000 people, right? And you can think about basically how
much effort you're willing to spend on the sale in each case.
So here tons can be
spent closing the deal.
Here maybe one phone call,
maybe, let's say a couple phone
calls can be spent closing the deal. And this
can be like, online only, right? So how do
you make a million dollars from a product? Well, you can either convince a million
people to give you one dollar, you can convince 1,000 people to give you thousand
dollars, or you can convince one person to give you a million dollars. There's no
other way to do it.
Now. Make it look fancy, put a Lambo on the background, and post to Instagram
as the new Warren Buffet. Yeah, I mean, but like, this stuff is
so simple. I don't know how anybody's stupid enough to
pay for MBAs that basically, like, here you go,
there you go. There's basically everything
you need to know, right? There's so much complexity
and depth. I can sit here and type forever if you wanted me to go
into, like, detail of how computers
work, but nobody seems to care about stuff like that. I don't think that's what
you guys care about out
of a million subs on Instagram, right? All right,
Right. So, yeah, look,
do I know how to do shit like this? Yeah, sure, if I cared,
right?
So fundamentally, you have to. Again,
Instagram is based
around consent, right? So you have a follower
and an influencer, right? It's the same basic market
economics, except influencer. It's the same basic market economics,
except it's not money,
it's clout. It doesn't really matter. The same basic
idea. So how do you, how do you get a million subs
in Insta? Well, you know, convince 1 million people
to subscribe to you. Now, there's a bunch of
ways to do this, right? So one
way to do it is like, with appealing content. Right now,
there's lots of different things you can appeal based on.
You can appeal to. You can appeal to novelty,
you can appeal to beauty,
you can appeal to sexuality,
you can appeal to funny,
right? So, I mean, that's kind of step
one. And if you don't have appealing content, you're not going to get.
Step two is be famous.
So this actually works if you guys remember my. Or this is
another way to do it. If you guys remember my thing yesterday.
Famous works on a few different levels, right? So you can say there's, there's FOMO
famous, right? Like, you want, you want people who fear missing
out, right? Like, oh, man, I gotta follow this guy, right? You can use,
so you can use fear basically to get people to follow you. There's like the
car crash mentality, which is similar
to fear of missing out, except, you know, maybe this is fear
of missing something positive,
Fear of missing something negative, right?
So, you know, you can take like, like, like, maybe Kanye west is kind
of a mix of both. Lindsay Lohan is very much in the
car crash mentality.
Yeah. And then there is like, you know,
dark arts. All right, so you can, you can buy followers.
These followers come from a few different places. There's cracked accounts,
there's big Russian people who crack
accounts. I think there's some new accounts you
can do little psychological tricks like make
your Insta private. If you make your Instagram private,
you. Again, you're appealing to this. You know what's
behind the curtain.
Follow to find out. Bros,
can you explain dynamic programming to you? So go on YouTube there's plenty of people
who make great graphics for what dynamic programming
is. The basic idea is
say you have some function, you know,
you have output F of X of Y and you can figure out
how to define F of X of Y in terms
of, say, you know, F of X minus 1, Y minus
1. Right. Dynamic programming is you build up like a
table using the previous outputs to
influence the next outputs. But again, you know, if you're
looking for an exact topic like that, there's plenty of videos
that'll do a better job explaining it than I can.
I don't really know. And I'm going to read some comments now.
And guys, if you could all. I will make it subscriber only if you guys
are writing stupid crap. Is this you guys always say,
oh, I want to learn, I want to learn, I want to learn. Like,
what is it that you want to learn?
Do some garbage collection and explain what Malloc is.
Def con sold out.
It was actually a really cool stream. Thank you. Here. So we have, we have
a VIP what not to waste your time
on. Okay, well, let's break that down
using the same sort of mentality.
So wasting time.
So the girl last night on the date told me a very.
She has a very interesting life philosophy.
If you guys know the story about the fox and sour grapes.
The fox is out walking, he sees a grapevine,
and there's a big juicy bundle of grapes sitting up there.
And he puts his paws up on the fence and he tries to reach it
and he can't. He climbs the
fence. He starts to climb the fence, but he cuts his paw.
And then he's like, you know, those grapes were probably
sour anyway, and he walks away. Right?
So this is the traditional sour grape story. And usually people who have
this, you know, those angry sort of people, but her take on
it was when she cut her paw, it must have been a divine sign
from God that the grapes were probably poisonous. It's like a positive
spin to the sour grape story. So I
don't know.
You know, if you go through life, everything that you don't get,
you just realize that you didn't want it anyway. And like, you really put a
positive spin on that. This is, this is an impenetrable fortress of
psychological. I don't know. But. But wasting
time. I don't know. Right.
So this gets into like, like existentialism,
right? The basic idea of existentialism is
you make your own meaning.
Sorry, now you asked if this is all existentialism
is. How did people write really long Books about it. And you'll have to ask
those people. People. But. So I don't know.
My personal philosophy is that there's no such thing as wasting time.
Like, it's a stupid. A time is just wasting time is
great. That's the point of time, to waste it.
You know, maybe. Maybe I'll add a caveat to
that. Don't fall in funnels.
Right. If you are in other people's
funnels, don't be
in Skinner boxes.
Skinner boxes, Right.
Maybe a. Don't fall in funnels,
don't be in Skinner boxes and don't be influenced
by advertising.
Can I explain algorithmic complexity? Sure.
Again, let's see if there's good content on
this already before I do it. What is algorithmic
complexity?
Algorithmic complexity is a measure of how long an algorithm would take to complete
given an input of size n. If an algorithm has to scale, it should compute
the result within a finite and practical time bound, even for large values of n.
For this reason, complexity is calculated asymptotically as N approach approaches
infinity. That's what big O notation is. Well, complexity is usually in terms of.
Okay, so this is a way of thinking
about it. How many
operations does it take for an input
of size N? Right? So you can take sorting algorithms. Sorting is usually
a good way to think about complexity.
So you can take like a bubble sort algorithm, right? Bubble sort
in pseudocode is something
along the lines of for I in 1 to
n, for J in I
to n. Or say I plus one to n.
If j is less than I swap.
So this algorithm is O of
N squared. Because you see this loop
start from zero. I'm not writing lua or nothing. So this loop
is N. This loop you can be like, well, no, the average is actually n
over two. But you know, n times n over two is,
you know, it's still O of n squared, right? So this is an O of
n squared sorting algorithm.
So you can take other sorting algorithms, other sorting algorithms basically
have this idea of we're going to build up a tree.
So say I want to sort the list, you know, three, five, four, six,
right? We take a tree, we put seven on
the top range, right? And now we say three is three less
than or equal to seven,
it's less than. So we'll put it on this side of the tree.
And now we do the same thing with 4.
So we say, well, okay, let's take 4,
4 less than or equal to 7. It's less than 7, less than or equal
to 3. It's it's greater than 3, so it goes here, right.
6. We have the same kind of. Well, this turned
out to not work too well because the height of this tree
is N. But let's say I added something like 10 in. You know, 10 would
go here in the tree. I didn't make my tree
too nice. Let's say I added a five in
the five would go here in the tree. And the size of this tree,
the height of this tree is log N.
So that's all the sort algorithms that are in N log n time
basically have some variant of this, right? So it's
N inserts into
a log N sized tree.
So there are actually sorting algorithms that run in O
of N.
So we can think about. Let's say the list that
I'm sorting is. Oh only is guaranteed
to only be numbers between 1 and 100.
So I can create a. Maybe this is something like
hash sort or something. I don't
know what the name of it is, but O of N sort. So I can
create an array like count sub
100 for I
in 0 to n count sub ARR sub
I plus equals 1,
right? And then I can loop through count and
then I say for.
Well, you know, I just like print.
You want to print out basically the like. Like the
number count number of times.
So you see how this is O of N. I have one loop going to
N and then I have one loop going to count,
which can be viewed as like a K.
And if K is small,
but this obviously only works if your,
your total number here is small because the
K, if the biggest element
in the array were to grow with
the length of the array, then the sort would not be O of N.
But assuming that it stays at 100, this sort is always O of N.
But usually the smallest sort is M login.
I think maybe that explains it better than this.
No, we're not solving any leet codes.
I'd like to see you improve an open source system that you'd like to
see improve and follow along as you help progressing issues
and features. People don't want to learn, they want to have
your skills. Yeah, they can get fucked.
Can I explain binary search time complexity?
Sure. So binary search find
an element in a
sorted list.
Something I say is hacking a lot of times is just
binary search by hand. Right?
So let's say you have an oracle
or we'll just do it straight up. Right? So here's a sorted list,
right?
Let's say I want to find 67, right?
So research 67.
So you start out with defining a a
low and a high. So we'll make the low the beginning of the
array and the high the length of the array.
So I now take a midpoint.
Let's say I look at the array. Array submit
is 22.
Now I know that it can't possibly be any of
these, right? So here's my pivot.
I say it can't possibly be any of these because 67 is greater than
22. So we can now say low equals mid.
So now I'm just looking at this array here.
So that's the first run of binary search, right?
So again, low zero, high is length of array mid.
Low plus high equals two. Let's say mid is
one. So we get 45. Low equals mid.
Alright, so now, now we're doing it again for
this and this time mid is 67.
Run it through so we can return that. We can figure out what the
index in the original array was. So notice
that this took three steps, which is significantly less than here.
N equals 7 because, because 7 is the length of the array. So binary search
runs an O of log n time. Again, you can think about it
similar to the tree where you're only walking down one path.
Instead, let's say instead of this sorted list being put contiguously,
it's a tree. How many jumps are you going to have to take in the
tree? It's log N.
What paper can implement beginner ML
engineer? Well that and that's a deep. What paper can implement a beginning
ML engineer? Oh, I don't know about that.
Yeah, data science is largely bs.
Anyone who's teaching you, if you're ever learning
a like
an object level skill, you're probably not
learning the right thing. Object level skills will die
out when the tools die out. But if you're learning kind
of meta level skills, then they're
never going to. It's like
truth about the world, right?
Are you learning something from
nature or are you learning something from people?
Right?
If you're learning something from nature, good. If you're learning
something from people, bad. Right? So you can, you can,
you can break pretty much everything down into, into this paradigm.
If you're learning like physics comes from nature, learning physics is good. If you're learning
celebrity gossip, this is just arbitrary bullshit about
people, it's bad. So one
of the founding themes for the college.
So we reject power over people
and this will actually make us ignored by the system.
A system cares deeply
about power over people,
embrace power over nature.
So yeah,
and then like Like, Like. Okay, so like, answering that question,
what is data science? Right.
If data science. If data science means, like, statistics.
Statistics, sure.
If data science means, like tooling used
at company X. No,
let's define F by.
For complex S with a positive real part.
How do I find all zeros of the function that
looks oddly like the Riemann Hypothesis?
Most of my math knowledge is in discrete math. I don't know
that much calculus.
I wouldn't really know how to do that. I mean, I could write a simulator
for that. And then we
can binary search for zeros. Assuming the function is continuous.
We can't exactly binary search.
Well, those things are going to get smaller, too.
Complex S with positive real particles. Oh, God, I gotta
do complex numbers too. I don't really know.
We want to learn how to learn efficiently learning strategies.
I don't know.
Helm AI is four years behind.
Come on.
Some of these questions, like, what books do you recommend?
How to stay hungry.
Elon talks about this a lot, right? So you want
to build a knowledge tree.
You build a knowledge tree, and that means that whenever you learn
new information fits into the tree tray.
People who I've met who
know a lot of things, it's not
even always that they know, maybe interpolation
is possible.
Even if you don't know exactly what's a node of a tree, if you have
some nodes nearby, you can kind of interpolate to it, right?
Yeah. So it's kind of a framework for understanding.
You can. You can root this knowledge tree.
So Elon talks about it. Elon roots
knowledge tree in physics.
Iroot, knowledge tree in information.
So my whole input, computation, output is this idea of
information. This is a modernist perspective, postmodernist perspective,
but both of those things are very, very good ways of
understanding. So. So, I mean,
how to explain anything.
I mean, you know, some of these were like, how to get a girlfriend.
Right. Input, system output. This is my core paradigm
for understanding any.
This is what. Richard Hamming was promoted a lot. That's like
a Hamming tree guy.
Coding theory was one of the classes I took that I couldn't do.
It was too hard for me.
I haven't seen. So Bezos.
Bezos basically uses this one trick.
Bezos operations mastermind. Right.
So, for example, Amazon ships many
packages.
When Amazon negotiates with ups, Bezos has
his guys draw up a Amazon shipping plan.
Right? Plan is,
let's say, sales pitch to ups.
Ups, you know,
gives real rate, right? Right.
Bezos wins.
I mean, that's, that's. That is the Amazon trick. Over and over
and over again. Again.
Oh, post structuralism. Oh. See, I like weird things like this.
I really, I really want to meet more. I really want to meet more women
and, and go on more dates. Like women who like, studied this stuff,
you know, like, like, like I, I met this, I have this.
Dated this one girl at Berkeley and she like, knew about all this stuff,
man. It's, It's a whole world. It's a whole world and I
try my best to understand, Understand it. I feel like I'll always kind of be
a tourist there.
Structuralism proposes that one may understand human culture by means of a structure
modeled on language. This understanding differs from
concrete reality and abstraction ideas instead as a third order that mediates between
the two.
Yeah. And then what's downstream of all this is the, is the,
is the modern trash.
Postmodernists were trolls, man. That's.
I was, I was on the phone with my friend last night and I was
like, you know what? I'm a post modernist. Like, I really,
I embrace these, these, I hold these
truths to be self evident.
Uh,
yeah, yeah, Bordj, Derrida, Foucault.
And they're trolls, but they're trolls who've shaped the modern world.
One thing that I wish I'd done differently when I was younger was
actually, I didn't. I rejected almost outright the humanities
as being any.
Oh, they were trolls. People just took them seriously.
I mean, they admitted as such, I rejected the
humanities as any sort of, any sort of source
of relevance in my life.
When, as I've grown up, I've come to realize
that the college
and the singularity,
the science doesn't matter.
I think one of the greatest tragedies in history was
that these incredibly intelligent scientists built a nuclear bomb
and then handed that bomb off to politicians like they're
subservient to them. What.
Why do
politicians or those kind of people have this power?
So something that is changing throughout history is
power over people. Used to be all, Used to be
everything,
right? If you, if you, you didn't.
If you lived in a, a tribe, right? If you lived in a, like a
hunter gatherer tribe,
the, the only thing. What, what made you alpha chimp, what made you alpha
chimp was, was having power over the other, the other chimps
not having power over nature. You weren't a 10x better hunter there.
There were no 10x better hunters. But power
over people is waning and
power over nature is waxing.
Waxing is the right word.
No, I don't want top 10 best waxing salons.
What I got waxing like a moon.
Yeah. Having. Increasing its apparent size.
I dropped out of philosophy undergraduate because I realized how much you were just learning
to tell logically sound stories to each other about how the
world is.
I wish. I wish there were a place where I could go to learn real
humanities. It seems like
being self taught in the humanities is more difficult.
I found a few. You come
upon a few texts in there and they're. And they're kind of mind blowing.
Sartre. What is literature?
Yeah. You should read this.
I'm reading. That was kind of the first
when I started to realize that. That there was a
huge path to what
is what is what is running a company. What is what is being. What is
being CEO. It's just telling stories. All you're
doing is telling stories. And we compete.
The world is a big competition of these stories.
What is the Wittgenstein verse? Tiring debate.
I have so much to read. I don't know and I guess this
is a lot of what I've been doing off stream, especially now is. Is just.
It's just reading. And I'm not.
There's no, there's no future in hacking.
There's practically no future in programming.
It's not a question of if the singularity is going to happen. It's a
question of when and what will it look like. And it
seems like what it will look like will be a lot less shaped
by programmers doing the grunt work and a lot more shaped
by who's telling the best stories. So,
you know, if you want to save the world, better learn how to tell stories.
Please teach me on becoming an expert in programming.
So wait, hang on.
What's the central kind of thesis of.
By the way, everybody should read.
Should read Turing's paper.
Ramsey. Wow. It's all the same people, man.
These people are all biologists want
to be chemists, all chemists want to be physicists, all physicists want to
be mathematicians, all mathematicians want to be philosophers and all philosophers
want to be employed.
Programmers are translators. Yeah.
This is what most software engineers do
all day, Go learn your stupid frameworks. Right.
But again, that's my same thing about data science. Right?
You know, tooling that will
go out of vogue. No.
Out of vogue. Maybe that's right, maybe that's wrong.
Yeah. Memetic theory, these basic
ideas. Peter Thiel, I read some new Peter Thiel thing. He really went hard
on that.
Do I think today we have less revolutionary, innovative minds in general than
before? No. How many people
can you name from the 20th century, like a hundred.
There's definitely revolutionary people around today.
I think that. Who's the most revolutionary person, I think, of the current millennium,
Satoshi Nakamoto. If you really
want to do things in some way, you got to do them anonymously.
I mean, that. That's just.
I don't know. Maybe that's not that true, but. Yeah.
I mean, look. Look at. Look at what Elon Musk is doing right there.
There are definitely people who are alive today who are going to be
remembered in.
I read the annotated Turing book. Yeah. Yeah. That's why I read the paper.
I'll show for the book.
Yeah.
Yeah. I recommend that book.
What is a good work ethic to have? So one
test that I like to use often to ask a question, if somebody's saying something,
say. Would anybody ever say the opposite? Right.
So if you have a politician who stands up on stage and says,
the children are our future. I care about the children.
They're not really saying anything because nobody would ever say the opposite.
So what is a good work ethic to have? I mean,
it's a meaningless question because the.
Like, you should slack off a
lot and, you know, not really pay attention,
do things sloppily. Yeah, Said nobody.
Ever.
Yeah. I'm chilling for myself, man. I'm just. Hoshi,
what's from less wrong.
I'm not saying you should do anything.
It's just a framework. It's a framework for thinking.
No, I see. I'm not. I'm really not interested in answering questions
about myself.
Why do you care? I'm. I'm nobody.
Who are you? You're nobody, too. Oh, they're coming after
me, man. Oh, no. Lock your doors, man.
I don't know. Like, it's. Again, people are boring.
Nature's interesting. Interesting. I'm a people, too. I'm pretty boring.
How do you think about recursion? This is a stack.
All right. Swat on my house. Oh, no.
This guy's gonna call a swat on my house. No, he's not. He's banned.
CRUD development will go away. Yeah, but it'll just become.
CRUD development will become the most lowest common denominator.
AI. You know, who's that
guy in office space you like? Well, I take the thing from the engineers and
I give it to the. I talk to the customer, and I give it to
the engineers. Right. That's all it's going to be.
Constructivist mathematics.
Yeah, of course. So my understanding of constructivism
says that you can't. The Law of the excluded middle doesn't apply.
So you can, you can't just make an assumption, find a contradiction and
say therefore the assumption is true.
That's why I really like things like cock, which like, so they
have a constructivist cock which says
if you want to say something's true, you can't just say, you can't just like,
yeah, find a contradiction. So I
think that like finitism, I believe
is true in a deep philosophical sense,
whereas constructivism is just another lens.
Where are the differences? What can you not.
What can you say in non constructivist mathematics
that you can't say in constructivist or just proofs?
Harder.
Taking the principle of the excluded middle from the mathematician would be the
same, say as prescribing the telescope to an astronomer or the box or
the use of his fists.
Yeah, so. So yeah,
construct. Is Google going to actually give me anything
for this? I want non constructivist truths. You can't derive
in constructivism.
Oh God, yeah. Aaron Schwartz, take down
J Store. J store Some
like learning theory. I don't know about that. Yeah, What I want to
know is like, like, yeah, what are the truths? Right. And then do they feel,
I don't know. I mean, I like, like intuitionism as well.
It's one thing to innovate in the computer science world, but it's another thing to
utilize it to make money, which is where you need translators to deliver.
So what is money?
I mean, okay,
it gets. I'm not going to go into this, but if
your goal in life is to make money, all I will say is that is
never for anybody a terminal goal. Making money
cannot be a terminal goal. Right. Money. Money itself
does not have any intrinsic value. Money only has.
Always think about what your terminal values are. Right.
Oh, this is. Let's find the slate
star codec society shocks.
Ah, yes.
Bostra makes an offhanded reference a the possibility of a dictatorless
dystopia, one that every single citizen, including the leadership, hates, but which
nevertheless endures unconquered. It's easy enough to imagine such
a state. Imagine a country with two rules. First, every person
must spend eight hours a day giving themselves strong electric shocks.
Second, if anyone fails to follow a rule, including this one,
or speaks out against it, or fails to enforce it, all citizens
must unite to kill that person. Suppose these rules were well enough established
by tradition that everyone expected them to be enforced. So you shock yourself
for eight hours a day because you know if you don't, everyone else will kill
you because if they don't Everyone else will kill them, and so on.
I heard the Russians used a similar tactic in order to prevent defection
in World War II. You know, a soldier on the front line
who's being told to charge a machine gun turret might want to run the other
way. But, you know, it is the job of everybody behind them
to shoot all the cowards. And if you do not shoot a cow coward,
you're a coward yourself and you'll be shot by somebody else.
Dictatorless dystopia.
So think about what you really want money for.
And are we really just in one of these dictatorless dystopias?
Where's my viewer count? It's gone.
And coward is whatever is defined by the Russian system.
Right? Are we running out of innovative ideas? No.
Oh, here we go. Easy example of a non constructivist proof without
an obvious fix.
Some digit occurs infinitely often in the decimal expansion of
PI. Have we proven that?
Oh, some digit occurs. Okay.
Perhaps you think of the statement that every digit occurs infinitely often,
which is probably open. Yeah, but some digit
occurs in infinitely often.
I mean. Yeah, okay, you're right. So the obvious proof there is assume for the
sake of contradiction, that no digits occur infinitely
often. Then given that there's a finite number of digits,
by the pigeonhole principle, PI is not a
transcendent number. But we know PI is a transcendent number,
therefore contradiction.
Qed.
This is another classic one. Yeah,
I mean, but I'm sure you can prove that the
square root of two is irrational. I'm sure you can prove that in
a constraint.
Constructivist proof. Square root
2. Irrational.
Direct proof of irrationality.
Simple direct proof that I found as a teenager.
Theorem did
a conductor ideal.
What? That's confusing.
Okay. Theorem is that it's integral
irrational. So, meaning it's an integer. If it's. If it's rational,
the proof.
Okay, so it's a reduced fraction. So the
greatest common divisor is one that's
using the extended Euclidean algorithm.
Yeah, that works. Sure.
Yeah. There you go. That's so much better. It's so
much better than the other proof.
Oh, Brower and can are examples. Let's say I
think that all of higher education today is whatever the opposite of
based is. You know, maybe cupped. That's kind
of the problem.
Like there's probably small numbers of holdouts
in these tentaculous
institutions.
Rise of administration costs
in colleges.
Here, it's there. Put it this way.
Administrative spending comprise just 26% of total educational spending by American
colleges. Three decades later.
Administrative wait.
Huh? Where'd the Other spending go.
I don't know,
maybe this isn't true. I'm not. I'm not that interested in looking into the case.
I mean, I witnessed this firsthand. I've heard from
speaking. Speaking with a lot of people just
how.
What does this word mean?
Yeah,
that's. That's not what I was thinking of, but yeah,
I'm not. I'm not. I'm not hopeful for the
future of the higher education system. Curtis describes it
as a state church.
Where do I expect newer generations to learn things like lower level programming or theory?
The same thing place everyone else did. What do
you mean? People always say this. People always say this about computer
science, man, the kids aren't really gonna learn how computers work.
Why? Because our math majors don't know how arithmetic works?
Like that's just a sign that someone was poorly educated.
It's not gonna like fade from the world. People say this,
but, you know, there's been so many other disciplines and I have
no idea why they think computer computer science is going to be different.
Look up the journal Constructive Approximation.
There's so much to learn. Guys know
what approximations and expansions are,
by the way? Oh, I mean, unfortunately,
it's a web archive, but can we look at how nice this web page is?
Someone criticized my use
of like looking at
the form and not the content.
But the form is an incredibly good predictor of content.
A website like this contains truths because
there's no other reason for someone to build it.
Unfortunately, it's been
taken offline. Let's see.
A website like this probably contains way
less truths, right? Compare the websites.
So now we see what's wrong with colleges.
I promise our university will
have a website that looks much more like this and much less like this.
Computer architecture A quantitative approach. Let's see
what we got. College is a funnel. Society's a
funnel, man.
Why would it. Show me the.
Show me a table of contents.
Is the president of Stanford.
I tried. Yeah. I click off the Kindle version.
I think. I don't think I need to worry.
Oh, take a look inside. Oh, cool.
See what we got.
Yeah,
I mean, this is. Yeah, if you want to study computer architecture, that's like a
decent.
This is. I mean, this is from Google. Takes like
10Ns to get to L1
cache. 100Ns to get to L2 takes
like a microsecond to get to memory. And it takes like a millisecond to get
to disk or whatever those numbers are. You should know that. Understand all of
that memory hierarchy. There's an old saying like there's two hard problems
in computer science. It's like search and caching or
something.
That's the quote Cache
invalidation and naming things.
The only two hard problems in computer science.
Cache invalidation, naming things and off by one errors.
Cool.
How do you get over a thousand people to watch you rant about how
you. They shouldn't need to watch people like you rant?
Oh no, we're just hanging out and like thinking,
I'll go back to reading in a bit.
I try my ideas out on Twitch, right? I tried Hammer out
and decided there's never gonna be a hammer. Fuck hammer. I tried
backspace out and it got a pretty good response on Twitch.
The problems with backspace are more technical and actually comes down to
more the question of what is programming? I don't want to make
if you want to do programming for work. If you want to make CRUD apps
like that's not really what I want to do in backspace.
I mean, the problem I
ran into with backspace is like,
is our modern programming languages
already the best way
to describe what you want?
How. Yeah,
like, yeah. What is is programming really just describing?
Is. Is there a more concise language? That's probably a better
way to. Is. Does there
exist a more concise programming
language?
AKA what
is the next gc?
Object oriented programming didn't deliver the improvements Garbage
collection did not having to deal with freeing your
memory.
I mean, so my basic thesis is like compilers
should do more search.
GC is garbage collection. So if I
write some. If I write some C code,
let's make a function.
So that's all well and good, except for this fact.
See, look at A out's memory usage, right?
Its memory usage is growing and we're going to have to kill it before it
keeps using more. Because there's a memory leak.
Because what happens in this program is every time A is called
called, I'm mallocing six bytes of memory, I'm taking six bytes
off the heap. And even though once this while loop comes around again,
those bytes are never accessible.
It doesn't matter.
The program's already allocated them. So to fix this bug, I can do that.
And now we'll see that A out does not increase memory usage.
So a GC would automatically find unreachable pointers
and free them.
Yeah. So Rust has a separate idea. Rust has this idea
of ownership,
but makes Rust very, very hard to code.
The beauty of gcs is that they operate completely in
the background and it would make this a valid program to run.
I could write this in go and go as a GC and it's fine if
you could find the shortest program that outputs the data. Yeah, sure. I shill
for the hotter prize a lot. Make it subscribers only. You never
see my chat. I see your chat and you're a subscriber.
All right, be right back. And then we'll
do subscriber only. Q and and then going back to reading.
What problems are we solving today? No real problems.
Shining like a diamond. What you reading?
I'm almost done with my. My book from yesterday. White noise.
What is this Dud baiting? Twitch prime dud. Can we do a
meetup before the singular?
What happens if you pass string copy a character array without a
null terminator? I mean
it'll just keep copying to its ever on the stack till it finds a null
terminator.
Is it any indication that we're not close to an efficient to write language when
we have functional programming that's so fundamentally different Languages
are getting better. I'm very. Oh man,
you know what I give to code in the language 20 years from now I'd
be so happy.
Cameo.com oh
this is like I can book like famous people to come to my party.
Okay. Personalized messages. Wow.
Oh, I gotta think about my brand. You know how
to solve constant growth of misinformation.
I mean has that ratio actually gotten worse?
Has the ratio of information to misinformation changed?
I'm not sure it has.
How does one be motivated?
Bro, this is dumb questions. Like think
of why that's a dumb question. What do you one
one way to ask if if something's a dumb question or not is like think
about what the structure of the answer you want is what
kind of structural like like like what what does the
space what does the range look like of the what does the output space
look like? You are the
kind of person who deserves Google because this
one weird trick to stay motivated is what you're
looking for there and that's the only answer you're going to get. And it's not
a real answer. So your curiosity is never going to be satiated and you're going
to keep googling that same crap over and over and over again.
There's not an answer are there's
less hierarchy and information distribution. I'm not
even sure about that.
So think about in some ways there's more hierarchy, right?
Oh, that's all right. Let me see if I can find. I wish I had
a Nice way to index this book. Better about
families.
Find the exact quote, they put it in the book a lot better than I'm
going to say it. But families are
held together based on untruths
and, and commonly shared lies.
I think that despite people
talking a lot about misinformation in
some ways, from my perspective, when people are screaming about fake news,
what they're actually mad about when they keep talking about
misinformation is actually that they don't control the narrative anymore.
It's not that the new narratives are any less true than
the old narratives. The old narratives are all lies as well. It's just
there's a different kind of group
providing the new narratives. The new narratives are coming from a different place.
And I think there is slightly more true than the old narratives, but only slightly.
Any advice to crack fang interviews?
Honestly, if they sit you down
and they're like, due to leetcode hard problems,
this is why I'm not doing leetcode on stream for you guys. It's like,
why waste your time memorizing that? They're. No, it's just insulting.
I mean, I think it's insulting to everybody who's being interviewed.
Like, they're not checking to
see whether you're a good programmer or not. They're checking to see whether you're
willing to grind for hours and hours and hours.
Right. The leetcode grind is real. Like, is that, is that the
kind of organization you want to go work at? An organization
that values you just grinding on something stupid and irrelevant
for hours.
That said, I think that programming challenges are an incredible
way to judge candidates.
But not timed ones.
Right. We have a.
Like, or, or at least
not time crunch in front of a person. We,
we have a, we have a, we have a hackering challenge for, for comma.
But we give you four hours and if you're good, you can do it in
under an hour. It's, it's not designed
to be, it's designed to be a freshman weeder
test, not some insane. This is how we're truly going
to judge you.
The speed challenge. Yeah, like, I like the speed challenge. It's kind of,
it's more open ended, but it has, it's, it's, it's more open ended
but it has a clear, rigid evaluation criteria.
It's an important, it's important to have interviews that are,
have clear evaluation criteria to avoid bias.
Don't take amphetamines. So my
experience with amphetamines, Adderall stimulants
is they do not make you better at things. They make you think you're better
at things. They trigger
this delusion.
If I am good at something, I want to believe I am good at something.
If I am bad at something, I want to believe I am bad at something.
Nootropics are mostly a scam.
Do you think humanities will ever be able to escape structures and hierarchies within
nature that combat transhumanism? I'm not sure exactly what
that means.
LSD doesn't give deep thoughts. It makes you think. All your thoughts are
deep. I have more positive things to say
about LSD than I do about amphetamines.
I think LSD shows you something.
And I
mean, like with all drugs, you know,
understand what it has to teach you and then stop.
I think I want to go to one of those ten day meditation retreats.
But I don't know. I don't really want to talk about drugs. They're not drugs.
Aren't that interesting.
Josh, about the new God of transhumanism.
What's the happiest memory? I don't really like talking about myself either. Most of these
things here, I don't really talk about myself. I do give anecdotes for my wife.
They're more to illustrate a point. Because anything
that I say about myself is personal and useless to you.
Don't be like me. It's dumb.
You know, try to give you information so you can think.
Don DeLillo. White noise.
Some of the stories are made up. Yeah, doesn't matter.
I haven't been drinking. Recess. Yeah, it's kind of nice.
I never read Euclid's Elements. Right. Cool.
It's about Pascal's Wager.
Pascal's mugging? Yeah.
It's a funny idea.
And this is why I'm not a consequentialist.
Many mangoes. That is kind of funny things.
By oh, oh, you mean just things in general.
Oh, I felt like things was like a. Yeah, of course.
Web app frameworks like Electron. Why don't we ship the operating system
in? Every Electron is just Docker man.
It's the same idea. No, I don't know.
Anything that makes deployment development easier is probably good.
Stannis La Limb,
can you think of any fun problems to tackle in your repos if you come
up with one?
No,
because it's in local folder. I'm probably much more likely to lose it than the
cloud.
The is a tc. If you want a high tc,
you gotta play the game.
You know what? There is a Star Trek Voyager episode.
Tc. Yes. Treatment Coefficient. Yes.
Yes. Critical care. Yes.
Just as the doctor asks what TC stands for.
Oh, Total compensation. Oh, you mean the team blinds. Oh,
my God. Oh, my God.
It's Pascal's mugging man.
Yeah, I'd like to go to Twente Persona. The problem
is I have to like, schedule it months in advance.
World Signia YT thank you for subscribing describing turning
into a lizard. Man, I love Voyager growing up, you know. You want
to know where I learned morality from? Star Trek. Voyager. So whatever Janeway
believe there. I believe.
All right, guys, thank you for watching the stream. If you enjoyed
today's stream, I'm gonna look at my revenues and if I got a lot of
revenue for this stream, we're gonna do more streams like this one.
But I don't know, I'm probably not going to stream for
a bit. It's the weekend. I got things to do that aren't
streaming. Please subscribe if you haven't subscribed
it. We like subscribers. Somebody asked
me earlier, do I believe that there are some people are better than others?
Yes, I believe that subscribers. Subscribers are better than non subscribers.
Rex Doors, thank you for subscribing.
Can you do an IRL stream?
Should I like, rent out a. You know, like they're hyped on the.
On the COVID Feels
good, man. Subs rise up. Yeah, there's a class system. All twitchers aren't
equal. There's subscribers and non subscribers. I don't. I don't tell lies.
You know, I'm a flex. Thank you for gifting subs.
Today's stream is top tier. I'm glad you liked it. Yeah, just get a mask
or something. Where's my mask? That's right. That's right,
boys. Today's flow is better.
Thank you. What's ocsp?
Oh, just some like, certification thing.
Vic, Jack, thank you for subscribing.
FaceTime is so funny.
Subscriber open pilot full lidar.
You take care to real port your subscriber. You're a good person.
Yeah. None of any certifications. Don't. Don't take me over security itself
is all. It's all racket. First we got to
scare them about hackers. Then we got to sell them the anecdote to hackers.
Antidote. Yeah, yeah.
Thank you, Ranch. Leo, thank you for subscribing
this. A take on morality of piracy. I don't believe in
universal morality or ethics. Make up your own mind, man.
Anybody who's trying to. But I do dislike anybody who
tries to preach to you morality or ethics. She tries to tell
you how you should act, man. Because this is just powerful people.
Moral relativist.
I have personal morals. I don't talk
about. Like I said, I don't really like talking about my on
these streams. I don't really think I talk about, like myself. Even this.
This is not really a comment about myself. This is a comment about the content.
The streams.
Post more Instagram pics.
Gula bulash. All right, well, you know what?
If I find out about this whenever streaming again,
you're banned. And you know what? People DM me all the time. My DMs
are full of. Can you please unban me? Yo, dude. Can you unban me,
sir? Yo, can you unban me, bro? You're banned for
life.
I don't think J was a moral relativist either. It's true.
Can I ban you? I'm not going to ban you. You're a subscriber. Subscriber.
Good person.
Good. I'm glad.
If Ro Jogan was like a mockery of the podcast,
I would totally go on Road Jogan. Like a mockery of that whole format.
Rojogen. Yo, is there really a Road Jogan? Let's check it
out.
Rojan Laser
Cat boss, you're close to getting banned. You don't care if
you're a subscriber, bro. Jogan,
there's nothing wrong with the format. It has
more to do with the reach is why I wouldn't go on Joe Rogan.
I just imagine. Saris. Wasn't that the bad guy in Galaxy Quest?
All right, guys. Thank you all for watching.
Good afternoon. Go learn real things.